From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnaman v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 19, 2012
369 S.W.3d 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 74479.

2012-06-19

Jeffrey KINNAMAN, Appellant v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Jeffrey Kinnaman, Appellant pro se. Robert A. Bedell, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
Jeffrey Kinnaman, Appellant pro se. Robert A. Bedell, for Respondent.
Before Division One: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, JAMES E. WELSH, Judge and ALOK AHUJA, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Jeff Kinnaman appeals from a decision issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his untimely appeal to the Appeal's Tribunal. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission's order is supported by sufficient evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Kinnaman v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 19, 2012
369 S.W.3d 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Kinnaman v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey KINNAMAN, Appellant v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

369 S.W.3d 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)