From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinkead v. Lysol Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 24, 1937
250 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

March 24, 1937.

Present — Sears, P.J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N.Y. 360; Antowill v. Friedmann, 197 App. Div. 230; Willson v. Faxon, Williams Faxon, 138 id. 359.) All concur, except Thompson, J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses plaintiff's complaint in an action for damages for loss of services and care of plaintiff's wife injured by use of a disinfectant.)


Summaries of

Kinkead v. Lysol Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 24, 1937
250 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Kinkead v. Lysol Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:LEONTINE KINKEAD, Appellant, v. LYSOL INCORPORATED and LEHN FINK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Kaempfe v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.

Cases so holding are legion with reference to wearing apparel, cathartics, face powders and sedatives. In…

SINGER v. OKEN

I hold it to be the established law of this State that in an action against a druggist for negligence wherein…