From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingvision Pay-Per-VIew, Ltd v. Nguyen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 3, 2021
2:01-CV-08919-WDK-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:01-CV-08919-WDK-SH

12-03-2021

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HAI-GIANG DUONG NGUYEN, et al, Defendant,

Eric Bensamochan, Bar #255482 The Bensamochan Law Firm ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF


Eric Bensamochan, Bar #255482 The Bensamochan Law Firm ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK

Based upon the application for renewal of the judgment of the original judgment, and pursuant to FRCP. 69(a) and C.C.P. §683.110 through §683.320, and for good cause appearing therefore, Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., and against Defendant, Hai-Giang Duong Nguyen individually and dba Café Asia and, Kim Nguyen individually and dba Café Asia, entered on April 16, 2002 and renewed January 11, 2012, be and the same is hereby renewed in the amounts as set forth below:

Renewal of money judgment

a. Total judgment

$ 5, 125.00

b. Costs after judgment

$ 00.00

c. Subtotal (add a and b)

$ 5, 125.00

d. Credits

$ 4, 740.00

e. Subtotal (subtract d from c)

$ 385.00

f. Interest after judgment (.12%)

$ 40.44

g. Fee for filing renewal of application

$ 00.00

h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g)

$ 425.44


Summaries of

Kingvision Pay-Per-VIew, Ltd v. Nguyen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 3, 2021
2:01-CV-08919-WDK-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Kingvision Pay-Per-VIew, Ltd v. Nguyen

Case Details

Full title:KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HAI-GIANG DUONG NGUYEN, et…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

2:01-CV-08919-WDK-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2021)