From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Perez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 20, 2008
06 Civ. 3613 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2008)

Opinion

06 Civ. 3613 (DAB).

August 20, 2008


ADOPTION OF REPORT RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court upon the August 4, 2008 Report and Recommendation ("Report") of United States Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), upon the issuance of a United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and "[w]ithin ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C);see also Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b) (providing that "[w]ithin 10 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations"). Despite being advised of these rules in Judge Katz's Report, to date, no party to this case has filed an Objection.

Where no timely objection to a Report and Recommendation is made, "a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record." Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). After conducting the appropriate level of review, the court may then accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Local Civil Rule 72.1(d).

Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz, dated August 4, 2008, be and the same hereby is, APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety;

2. Pursuant to Judge Katz's recommendations, it is ORDERED as follows: a judgment in the above-captioned case is entered for Plaintiff awarding $17,700.00 in statutory damages; $761.50 for attorneys' fees; and, $550.00 for costs, against Defendants, jointly and severally, for a total judgment of $19,011.50.

3. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE this case and remove it from the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Perez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 20, 2008
06 Civ. 3613 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD., as Broadcast Licensee of the November 13…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

06 Civ. 3613 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2008)