Opinion
No. 67897
05-19-2015
ANNE SORGE KINGSBURY, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MATHEW HARTER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JOHN R. KINGSBURY, Real Party in Interest.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order granting summary judgment in an action for divorce. Having reviewed the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioner has not met her burden of demonstrating that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is warranted, because petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the adverse final judgment. NRAP 3A(b)(1) (allowing an appeal from a final judgment); NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (holding that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief); see also NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly we,
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District Judge
Louis C. Schneider, LLC
The Jacks Law Group
Eighth District Court Clerk