From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingsberry v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jul 29, 2009
Case No. C07-5706RBL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. C07-5706RBL.

July 29, 2009


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION IN PART


THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Class Discovery Deadlines and Scheduling Order. [Dkt. #80]. Plaintiff seeks 90 additional days to complete discovery (and also has pending a Motion to compel Discovery responses [Dkt. #79]).

Defendant strenuously opposes the extension, accusing the Plaintiff of "sleepwalking through 15 months of discovery." It also opposes the Motion to compel, arguing that the discovery sought either has been answered or is irrelevant. It claims that there is no good cause for an extension because much of the discovery sought will be provided (immediately) before the current deadline, and because the delay is due to the Plaintiff's lack of diligence. Plaintiff denies these allegations.

As is often the case with respect to discovery disputes, it is difficult and largely fruitless for the court to ascertain exactly how the situation came to be. It is true that there have been several extensions, but it is also true that there appears to be outstanding discovery, and that there has been fairly extensive motion practice during the case's existence.

The Court GRANTS the Motion to Amend the Class Discovery Deadlines and Scheduling Order [Dkt. #80], as follows:

The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Motion for Class Certification is extended until August 24, 2009. Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Class Certification is due September 28, 2009. Plaintiff's Reply Brief is due October 23, 2009. The Motion for Class Certification shall be noted on the motion calendar for October 30, 2009. Class and Merits discovery is bifurcated as follows: Class discovery deadline is August 21, 2009. Merits discovery will begin, if necessary, after a ruling on the class certification issue. The remaining schedule will remain the same, and any future impacts on the remaining trial schedule will be addressed as they arise. The Court will issue a separate Order resolving the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [Dkt. #79].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kingsberry v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jul 29, 2009
Case No. C07-5706RBL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Kingsberry v. Chicago Title Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KINGSBERRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

Case No. C07-5706RBL (W.D. Wash. Jul. 29, 2009)