From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 29, 2005
693 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A04-2071.

March 29, 2005.

Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals; Paul Rieke, Judge.

Robert E. King, pro se appellant.

Karen Ruth Swanton, Fitch, Johnson, Larson, Walsh, and Held, Minneapolis, for Auto-Owners Ins. Co., respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice


Summaries of

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 29, 2005
693 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Robert G. KING, Relator, v. WOODSMAN MIDWEST, INC., and Auto-Owners…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 29, 2005

Citations

693 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 2005)