From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Wolfe

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 27, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-cv-621 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-621.

February 27, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


On February 8, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that petitioner's request for a stay be denied, and that the instant habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. Although the parties were specifically informed of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner's request for a stay is DENIED. This action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Wolfe

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 27, 2007
CASE NO. 2:06-cv-621 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2007)
Case details for

King v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KING, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY WOLFE, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-621 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. King

This application has been denied. King v. Wolfe (S.D. OH Feb. 27, 2007), 2007 WL 666626. {¶ 13} On or about…

State v. King

{¶ 9} On July 21, 2006, Appellant filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…