From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Whitmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2021
Case No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

20-13134

07-14-2021

TIMOTHY KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GRETCHEN WHITMER, et al., Defendants, and CITY OF DETROIT, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, and ROBERT DAVIS, Intervenor-Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

LINDA V. PARKER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 14, 2021, counsel for Plaintiffs' counsel filed an emergency motion asking the Court to release the video of the July 12 hearing in this matter. (ECF No. 152.) Counsel argues that “[t]hroughout our history, the open courtroom has been a fundamental feature of the American judicial system.” (Id. at Pg ID 5286 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1177 (6th Cir. 1983).) The Court in fact threw the virtual doors to the July 12 proceeding wide open—far wider than could have been accommodated had the hearing been conducted in person. As counsel notes in the motion, more than 13, 000 people watched live, “viewing the proceedings just as they were conducted.” (ECF No. 152 at Pg ID 5287.) As to counsel's suggestion that the video is needed to prepare a supplement brief, attorneys routinely prepare such briefs following a hearing without video or audio recordings of the proceedings and often without a transcript.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the emergency motion (ECF No. 152) is DENIED.


Summaries of

King v. Whitmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2021
Case No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

King v. Whitmer

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GRETCHEN WHITMER, et al., Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

Case No. 20-13134 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 14, 2021)