From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
NO. 3-11-CV-0945-M-BD (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-CV-0945-M-BD

08-13-2012

JAMES KING, ET AL. Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated July 10, 2012, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and costs [Doc. #36] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff James H. King is hereby ordered to pay Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. the sum of $20,000.00.

____________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

King v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
NO. 3-11-CV-0945-M-BD (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

King v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES KING, ET AL. Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-11-CV-0945-M-BD (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2012)