From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Villegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC)

11-20-2019

JERRY LEE KING, Plaintiff, v. R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, Defendants.


ORDER RE: LODGED AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 90) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Jerry King ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff lodged a proposed amended complaint. (ECF No. 90). However, Plaintiff did not file a motion for leave to amend along with the complaint. Plaintiff previously filed a motion for leave to amend, but the prior motion does not address all of the claims Plaintiff is attempting to add, and has already been denied (ECF No. 89).

Accordingly, the Court will give Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a motion for leave to amend.

The Court provides the following legal standards. Courts "should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). "[T]his policy is to be applied with extreme liberality." Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Rose, 893 F.2d 1074, 1079 (9th Cir. 1990). See also Waldrip v. Hall, 548 F.3d 729, 732 (9th Cir. 2008). "However, liberality in granting leave to amend is subject to several limitations. Those limitations include undue prejudice to the opposing party, bad faith by the movant, futility, and undue delay." Cafasso, U.S. ex rel. v. Gen. Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1058 (9th Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). See also Waldrip, 548 F.3d at 732. "[T]he consideration of prejudice to the opposing party [] carries the greatest weight." Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003).

Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a motion for leave to amend. If Plaintiff files a motion for leave to amend, Defendants' response is due within twenty-one days of the date of the order lifting the stay. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 20 , 2019

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

King v. Villegas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 20, 2019
Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2019)
Case details for

King v. Villegas

Case Details

Full title:JERRY LEE KING, Plaintiff, v. R. VILLEGAS and P. CRUZ, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 20, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:17-cv-00676-AWI-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2019)