From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Mar 26, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00428-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 26, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00428-TES-CHW

03-26-2020

DANA KYLE KING, Plaintiff, v. CYRUS VANCE, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

In his Recommendation [Doc. 10], the United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 1] without prejudice and deny as moot Plaintiff's pending motion for injuncting relief [Doc. 7] because Plaintiff failed to state an actionable § 1983 claim.

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's Recommendation; therefore, the Court reviews his findings for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). After a review of his findings, the Court finds no clear error in the magistrate judge's Recommendation.

Accordingly, the Recommendation [Doc. 10] is hereby ADOPTED and MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 1] and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's pending motion [Doc. 7] for injunctive relief.

SO ORDERED, this 26th day of March, 2020.

S/ Tilman E. Self, III

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

King v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Mar 26, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00428-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 26, 2020)
Case details for

King v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:DANA KYLE KING, Plaintiff, v. CYRUS VANCE, JR., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00428-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 26, 2020)