From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Toce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 15, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00050-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. May. 15, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00050-BAJ-RLB

05-15-2019

RAYMOND KING v. PAUL TOCE, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Report and Recommendation addresses Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18). Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to timely perfect service. Defendants claimed that Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed because service of process was not effected within 90 days of the filing of the complaint as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Motion to Dismiss be DENIED, and Plaintiff's complaint be considered TIMELY.

The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen (14) days from the date they received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 33 at p. 1). Neither party objected. Having carefully considered the underlying Complaint, the instant motions, and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service is deemed to have been TIMELY.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 15th day of May, 2019.

/s/ _________

JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

King v. Toce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
May 15, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00050-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. May. 15, 2019)
Case details for

King v. Toce

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND KING v. PAUL TOCE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 18-CV-00050-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. May. 15, 2019)