From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2006
No. 05-05-00259-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-05-00259-CR

Opinion Filed January 24, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P.

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-48401-IU. Affirm.

Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


A jury convicted Ernie Denumbry King of unlawful possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams. During the punishment phase, appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court found the enhancement paragraphs true and sentenced appellant to twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2006
No. 05-05-00259-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNIE DENUMBRY KING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 24, 2006

Citations

No. 05-05-00259-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)