From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 23, 2015
No. 67173 (Nev. Feb. 23, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67173

02-23-2015

DARREN MAURICE KING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is pro se appeal from district court orders denying a motion to waive fees for production of court case records, transcripts, and other materials and a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David B. Barker, Judge.

We lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the aforementioned orders. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists); Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995) ("[N]o appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reconsideration."). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge

Darren Maurice King

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

King v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 23, 2015
No. 67173 (Nev. Feb. 23, 2015)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARREN MAURICE KING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

Citations

No. 67173 (Nev. Feb. 23, 2015)