However, Brown did not object to the admission of this evidence, testified himself about his drug dealing and involvement in prostitution, and did not request a charge limiting the pattern charge on impeachment. See King v. State, 195 Ga. App. 865 (4) ( 395 S.E.2d 1) (1990). The charge was applicable to numerous other witnesses who testified at trial.

Moclaire v. State, 215 Ga. App. 360, 365 (7) ( 451 S.E.2d 68) (1994). See also Anderson v. State, 200 Ga. App. 29, 30 (3) ( 406 S.E.2d 791) (1991) (testimony material to show defendant's clothing); King v. State, 195 Ga. App. 865 (3) ( 395 S.E.2d 1) (1990) (testimony relevant to show defendant's presence at scene shortly before crime). Pettis also claims this evidence impugned his character, as it allowed the jury to infer that he must have been doing something wrong at Olympia Pizza the night before the armed robbery.