From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 10, 1980
271 S.E.2d 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

59983.

SUBMITTED JUNE 2, 1980.

DECIDED JULY 10, 1980. REHEARING DENIED JULY 22, 1980.

Forgery. Clayton Superior Court. Before Judge Crumbley.

Jay W. Bouldin, for appellant.

Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Clifford A. Sticher, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Sherri L. King brings this appeal following her conviction of forgery in the first degree.

1. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal based on an alleged fatal variance in the indictment. Time was not made a material element of the offense charged and the state proved that the offense occurred within the statute of limitation prior to the return of the indictment. Wade v. State, 147 Ga. App. 511 ( 249 S.E.2d 323) (1978).

2. The trial court did not err in denying Ms. King's motion for a directed verdict based on the grounds that the state failed in carrying the burden of proof. We have examined the entire transcript and find that the state did indeed carry its burden. The witnesses testified that she attempted to pass one dollar bills altered at the corners to resemble ten dollar bills, and the defendant herself admitted passing an altered bill at Reed's Drugs and that she thought it was counterfeit.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 2, 1980 — DECIDED JULY 10, 1980 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 22, 1980 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 10, 1980
271 S.E.2d 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:KING v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 10, 1980

Citations

271 S.E.2d 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
155 Ga. App. 418

Citing Cases

Minnix v. State

It is not material to the resolution of this enumeration that the accusation's allegation that the crime…

Angevine v. State

"Time was not made a material element of the offense charged and the state proved that the offense occurred…