From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2018
NO. EDCV 17-2435-R (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2018)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 17-2435-R (KS)

07-30-2018

RASHAD LAMAR KING, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), the Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") and related briefing, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"), and Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Objections ("Response'). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. \\ \\ \\

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Petition is DENIED; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: July 30, 2018

/s/_________

MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

King v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2018
NO. EDCV 17-2435-R (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2018)
Case details for

King v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:RASHAD LAMAR KING, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 30, 2018

Citations

NO. EDCV 17-2435-R (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2018)