From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Singer Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 8, 1981
279 S.E.2d 367 (S.C. 1981)

Opinion

21481

June 8, 1981.

J. Hamilton Stewart, III, M. Baker Wyche, III, and Henry S. Knight, Jr., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, Stewart Edwards, Greenville, for appellant. Harold R. Lowry, of Lowery Hood, Anderson, for respondent.


June 8, 1981.


This appeal is from a circuit court order in an action for workmen's compensation for alleged disability caused by an occupational disease. The circuit court reversed the Industrial Commission's determination that the single commissioner had erred by failing to submit the case to a Medical Board pursuant to Section 42-11-120 S.C. Code (1976). Because the determination of the Commission is a matter not affecting the merits of the cause of action, its decision is unreviewable by either the circuit court or this Court for lack of finality. Chastain v. Spartan Mills, 228 S.C. 61, 88 S.E.2d 836 (1967); cf. Cord v. E.H. Hines Construction Co., 220 S.C. 356, 67 S.E.2d 667 (1951); see also § 14-3-330, S.C. Code (1976). The order of the circuit court is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.


Summaries of

King v. Singer Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 8, 1981
279 S.E.2d 367 (S.C. 1981)
Case details for

King v. Singer Co.

Case Details

Full title:Carol KING, Respondent, v. The SINGER COMPANY, POWER TOOL DIVISION…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 8, 1981

Citations

279 S.E.2d 367 (S.C. 1981)
279 S.E.2d 367

Citing Cases

S.C. Baptist Hospital v. S.C.D.H.E.C

An agency decision which does not decide the merits of a contested case, but merely remands to the Department…

Owens v. Canal Wood Corp.

It is therefore interlocutory and not reviewable by this Court for lack of finality. Hunt v. Whitt, 279 S.C.…