King v. Ryan

1 Citing case

  1. Veseli v. Hacker-Agnew

    No. CV-18-08029-PCT-JAT (D. Ariz. Apr. 17, 2019)

    Id. The Court assumes Respondent would now argue that calculation was in error. See also Castillo v. Ryan, No. CV-15-00288-TUC-JGZ-DTF, 2017 WL 2579057, at *1 (D. Ariz. May 4, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV-15-00288-TUC-JGZ, 2017 WL 2573186 (D. Ariz. June 14, 2017) (formally denying the post-conviction relief petition following petitioner's failure to file pro se); King v. Ryan, No. CV15-0265-PHX-NVW-ESW, 2016WL 536654, at *1 (D. Ariz. Jan. 19, 2016), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV-15-00265-PHX-NVW-ESW, 2016 WL 524714 (D. Ariz. Feb. 10, 2016) (same); Pickens v. Schriro, No. CV-08-1087-PHX-ROS, 2009 WL 2870219, at *1 (D. Ariz. Sept. 3, 2009) (same). As far as the Court can determine, it is common practice for the state court to formally deny the petition for post-conviction relief if no pro se petition is filed.