From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2505-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2505-FCD-CMK-P.

August 30, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to court order, petitioner has filed an amended petition (Doc. 53) which is "mixed" in that it contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Petitioner has also filed a motion (Doc. 52) for an order staying these proceedings and holding consideration of the amended petition in abeyance ("stay-and-abeyance") pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims. Respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's stay-and-abeyance motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents shall file a response to petitioner's stay-and-abeyance motion within 30 days of the date of service of this order.


Summaries of

King v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2505-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2006)
Case details for

King v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. KING, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2505-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2006)