Opinion
2:19-cv-1916-JAM-CKD
12-29-2021
GORDON KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PORTFOLIO PRESERVATION, LLC, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
On December 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 51) which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No. objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 51) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Plaintiffs' motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 45, 46) are GRANTED;
3. Judgment is entered in plaintiffs' favor and against defendant Portfolio Preservation, LLC dba Aegis Shield, and against Aegis American Risk Management Group.
4. Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $2,001,273.58.
5. Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $12,105.35.