From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Pool

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 21, 1915
153 P. 860 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 7665

Opinion Filed December 21, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Case-Made. Where plaintiff in error fails to make and serve his case-made within the time allowed by statute, or within the time as extended by the court before the expiration of the statutory period, the same is a nullity, and, on motion, the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County. Geo. C. Crump, Judge.

Action between Annie King and J.W. Pool. From the judgment, Annie King brings error. Dismissed.

Lafayette Walker, for plaintiff in error.

Rossiter Wright, for defendant in error.


The order overruling the motion for a new trial in this cause was made and entered on March 29, 1915. The record before us fails to disclose that an extension of the time for serving case-made was made by the trial court until May 26, 1915. As the case-made was not served within the time allowed by statute (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5242), nor did the trial court attempt to extend the time for such service before the expiration of the statutory period, nor is the record certified as a transcript, it follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

King v. Pool

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 21, 1915
153 P. 860 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

King v. Pool

Case Details

Full title:KING v. POOL

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 21, 1915

Citations

153 P. 860 (Okla. 1915)
153 P. 860

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Reed

Plaintiff contends that the motion to dismss depends upon the construction of the words, "ths date" as used…

Durant v. Stanfield

"Where case-made is not served on opposing counsel within the time allowed by law or order of the trial court…