These are distinct and cumulative remedies. See King v. Oak Ridge Apartments, No. 04-16-00667, 2017 WL 2562743, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 14, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). Tyurin further alleged that FIA retaliated against his justice court suit in the form of additional theft by taking all the cash from all his accounts and by cancelling his credit card account.
(mem. op.); King v. Oak Ridge Apartments, No. 04-16-00667-CV, 2017 WL 2562743, at *1 (Tex. App.- San Antonio June 14, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).
As Kane points out in her brief, courts have held that a direct appeal and a writ of certiorari are "distinct and cumulative remedies to redress the alleged injustice suffered" in a justice court. Thomas King v. Oak Ridge Apartments, No. 04-16-00667-CV, 2017 WL 2562743, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 14, 2017, no pet.) (citing Huebsch Mfg. Co. v. Coleman, 113 S.W.2d 639, 641 (Tex. Civ. App.—Amarillo 1938, no writ)). However, in this case, Kane's appeal was assigned to the County Court at Law No. 2, a different court than her Petition.