King v. Nielsen

Full title: WILLIAM KING, Plaintiff, v. JAMES NIELSEN, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

No. CIV S-03-2672 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2672 LKK JFM P.

September 12, 2005

ORDER

LAWRENCE KARLTON, Senior District Judge

Plaintiff, an individual serving a civil commitment term at Atascadero State Hospital proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's January 28, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.