From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Navy Fed. Credit Union

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 23, 2024
CV 23-05915-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-05915-SPG-AGR

02-23-2024

Andrew King v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

On January 26, 2024, the Court filed its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 28). The Court dismissed Plaintiff's breach of contract claim with prejudice and dismissed Plaintiff's California Unfair Competition Law claim with leave to amend. (Id. at 13). Plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint within fourteen calendar days of the Court's order or the case would be dismissed. On February 12, 2024, Plaintiff notified the Court that he would not file a second amended complaint and requested the case be terminated. (ECF No. 29).

Accordingly, the case is dismissed without prejudice, and the Court orders the case closed.


Summaries of

King v. Navy Fed. Credit Union

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 23, 2024
CV 23-05915-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2024)
Case details for

King v. Navy Fed. Credit Union

Case Details

Full title:Andrew King v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 23, 2024

Citations

CV 23-05915-SPG-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2024)

Citing Cases

Milles v. Fifth Third Bank

On the other hand, TISA does preempt a plaintiff's claim challenging “[a depository institution's] failure to…