From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Moore

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 30, 2013
77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)

Opinion

No. 377 2013.

2013-09-30

Ryan W. KING, Petitioner Below–Appellant, v. Lauren MOORE, Respondent Below–Appellee.


Court Below—Family Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, File No. CN09–02671 Petition No. 12–34839.

ORDER


MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

This 30th day of September 2013, it appears to the Court that, on September 12, 2013, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10–day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

King v. Moore

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Sep 30, 2013
77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)
Case details for

King v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:Ryan W. KING, Petitioner Below–Appellant, v. Lauren MOORE, Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

77 A.3d 272 (Del. 2013)