From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Miller

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 27, 2022
22-CV-3336 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3336 (LTS)

07-27-2022

SHARIF KING, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER O. MILLER, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge.

By order dated June 6, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Miller

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 27, 2022
22-CV-3336 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

King v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:SHARIF KING, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER O. MILLER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3336 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)