From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Milazzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 15, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant Hopkins further discovery. By demanding that plaintiffs file a note of issue defendant was no longer entitled to further deposition (see, CPLR 3216; Wolanin v Halliman, 145 A.D.2d 967, 968; Gray v Crouse-Irving Mem. Hosp., 107 A.D.2d 1038).


Summaries of

King v. Milazzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

King v. Milazzo

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE E. KING, an Adult Incapable of Prosecuting Her Rights, by GEORGE J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Darko v. New York City Transit Authority

The filing of a note of issue or a demand for such filing is tantamount to asserting that all pretrial…

Witmer v. Biehls

By demanding that plaintiff file a note of issue, with the concomitant necessity of filing a statement of…