From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KING v. LU

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-3312 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3312 KJN P.

January 21, 2011


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed December 21, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: January 20, 2011


Summaries of

KING v. LU

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-3312 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)
Case details for

KING v. LU

Case Details

Full title:DALE KING, Plaintiff, v. T. LU, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3312 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)