From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Lenscrafters, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 24, 2010
No. C 09-3081 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 09-3081 SI.

February 24, 2010


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY


Defendant Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., has filed a motion to stay this action. The motion is scheduled for a hearing on March 5, 2010, and no party has filed an opposition to the motion. Defendant seeks to stay this case until a ruling has been issued on final approval of the settlement in Felice Martinez v. LensCrafters, Inc., C 08-1699 PJH. The motion for final approval of the Martinez settlement is scheduled for a hearing on April 14, 2010.

Defendant asserts that this case is factually and legally related to Martinez, and thus that it is in the interest of fairness and efficiency to stay this case pending a determination of final approval of the Martinez settlement. Based upon these representations, the relatively short period of the anticipated stay, and the lack of opposition by any party, the Court finds a stay is appropriate and GRANTS defendant's motion. (Docket No. 28). The March 5, 2010 hearing date, as well as the case management conference scheduled for that date, are VACATED. The Court shall hold a case management conference on April 23, 2010 at 3:00 pm.

When this lawsuit was filed, the parties jointly sought to relate this action to Martinez. Judge Hamilton denied the related case motion, and subsequently stated that the basis for her decision was her view that if Martinez settled, the present case would not continue. Defendant's motion for stay states that the Martinez and King actions do not contain a complete identity of claims and parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Lenscrafters, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 24, 2010
No. C 09-3081 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)
Case details for

King v. Lenscrafters, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LENSCRAFTERS, INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-3081 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)