From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. L. R. School. Dist

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 24, 1988
758 S.W.2d 708 (Ark. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-134

Opinion delivered October 24, 1988

1. JUDGMENT — ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. — ARCP Rule 54(b) provides that when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all the parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. 2. APPEAL ERROR — NO FINAL, APPEALABLE JUDGMENT. — Where the order did not dispose of all the parties, nor did the trial court direct the entry of a final judgment, there was no appealable order, and the appeal was dismissed.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Sixth Division; David B. Bogard, Judge; appeal dismissed.

Nussbaum, Newcomb Hendrix, for appellant.

Friday, Eldredge Clark, for appellee.


The appellant filed a tort action in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County against the Little Rock School District, Trinity Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Irving J. Dennis. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss on behalf of the Little Rock School District. The appellant filed a notice of appeal, and the transcript was lodged in this court. However, the order appealed from is not an appealable order pursuant to ARCP Rule 54(b).

Rule 54(b) provides that when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. Here, the order did not dispose of all the parties, nor did the trial court direct the entry of a final judgment. See Bryan Farms, Inc. v. State of Arkansas, 295 Ark. 180, 747 S.W.2d 115 (1988); and 3-W Lumber Co. v. Housing Authority, 287 Ark. 70, 696 S.W.2d 725 (1985).

Inasmuch as the order appealed from did not comport with the requirements of the rule, there is no appealable order. The appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

King v. L. R. School. Dist

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 24, 1988
758 S.W.2d 708 (Ark. 1988)
Case details for

King v. L. R. School. Dist

Case Details

Full title:Carolyn KING, Mother, Natural Guardian and Next Friend of Katrina King, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 24, 1988

Citations

758 S.W.2d 708 (Ark. 1988)
758 S.W.2d 708

Citing Cases

Winkler v. Bethell

[1] Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure — Civil 2(a)(1) (2005) allows an appeal to be taken to the Arkansas…

Wallner v. McDonald

Here the Chancellor did no more than recite the words of the Rule, and that is insufficient. Absent…