From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Burr

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 28, 2017
No. 173 MM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2 MM 2017

02-28-2017

DANIEL KING v. HON. CHARLES B. BURR II, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY PETITION OF: DANIEL KING AND THOMAS P. GANNON


ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED. The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Furthermore, a Rule is issued upon Petitioners to show cause why they should not be barred from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gannon, Esquire, from representing Daniel King.

This Rule is RETURNABLE on March 14, 2017. Any replies shall be due ten days thereafter.

Jurisdiction is RETAINED pending consideration and disposition of the submissions relative to the Rule to Show Cause.


Summaries of

King v. Burr

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 28, 2017
No. 173 MM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 28, 2017)
Case details for

King v. Burr

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL KING v. HON. CHARLES B. BURR II, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 28, 2017

Citations

No. 173 MM 2016 (Pa. Feb. 28, 2017)