From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2012
476 F. App'x 123 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-17929 D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01425-JCM-LRL

04-23-2012

SHANNON KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding


Argued and Submitted April 17, 2012

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, O'SCANNLAIN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Shannon King appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her mortgagee, GMAC Mortgage, LLC ("GMAC").

The district court did not err in granting GMAC summary judgment on any of King's claims: As King had fallen behind on her mortgage payments, she is unable to make a claim for misrepresentation, promissory estoppel, or wrongful foreclosure. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nev. Bell, 825 P.2d 588, 592 (Nev. 1992) (per curiam); Pink v. Busch, 691 P.2d 456, 459 (Nev. 1984) (per curiam); Collins v. Union Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 662 P.2d 610, 623 (Nev. 1983). King's breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of frauds. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.210(1). And King is unable to make a claim for unjust enrichment since there was a valid mortgage agreement between the parties. Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (Nev. 1997) (per curiam).

King's remaining contentions are either waived or without merit.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

King v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2012
476 F. App'x 123 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

King v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

476 F. App'x 123 (9th Cir. 2012)