From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 28, 2023
3:18-cv-00202-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:18-cv-00202-RCJ-WGC

02-28-2023

ALEXANDER STEVEN KING, Petitioner, v. TIM GARRETT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ROBERT C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondents seek an extension of time to file their response to Petitioner's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 60.) The Court finds that the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore, good cause exists to grant Respondents' motion.

It is therefore ordered that Respondents' second unopposed motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 60) is granted. Respondents have until April 28, 2023, to file their response.


Summaries of

King v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 28, 2023
3:18-cv-00202-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

King v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER STEVEN KING, Petitioner, v. TIM GARRETT, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

3:18-cv-00202-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)