From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Evans

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 11, 2009
No. C 00-1988 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)

Opinion

No. C 00-1988 SI.

February 11, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT


Petitioner has requested oral argument on his petition for habeas corpus. The Court agrees that oral argument is warranted and GRANTS petitioner's request. The Court also finds that an evidentiary hearing may be helpful to deciding petitioner's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel on the basis of his trial attorney's failure to consult a medical sexual assault expert and to present expert witness testimony in his defense. The Court directs the parties to advise the Court by letter brief as to their positions on whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. They should also list the witnesses they would seek to call, should such a hearing be held. Petitioner shall file his brief by February 17, 2009. Respondent shall file his response by February 24, 2009. Oral argument will be calendared once the Court receives the parties' briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Evans

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 11, 2009
No. C 00-1988 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)
Case details for

King v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD KING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL S. EVANS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Citations

No. C 00-1988 SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)