From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Dicenzoiii

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.
Oct 15, 2021
2:19cv992 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:19cv992 Electronic Filing

10-15-2021

ANDREW KING, Plaintiff, v. ARRESTING OFFICER VINCENT DICENZOIII, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, NORTH VERSAILLES TOWNSHIP, Defendants,


ORDER OF COURT

DAVID STEWART CERCONE SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2021, upon due consideration of defendant Allegheny County's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and after de novo review of the record, IT IS ORDERED that [66] the motion be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The County of Allegheny is dismissed from this case with prejudice. The [71] Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of September 8, 2021, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

cc: Louis K. Kroeck, IV, Esquire Dennis R. Biondo, Jr., Esquire Charles H. Saul, Esquire Kyle T. McGee, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail) 1


Summaries of

King v. Dicenzoiii

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.
Oct 15, 2021
2:19cv992 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2021)
Case details for

King v. Dicenzoiii

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW KING, Plaintiff, v. ARRESTING OFFICER VINCENT DICENZOIII, COUNTY OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.

Date published: Oct 15, 2021

Citations

2:19cv992 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2021)