From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Coloplast Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 30, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00974 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00974

11-30-2020

REBECCA KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COLOPLAST CORP., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On November 13, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 27, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Coloplast Corp., pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: November 30, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

King v. Coloplast Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 30, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00974 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

King v. Coloplast Corp.

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COLOPLAST CORP., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00974 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 30, 2020)