From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2016
Case No. CV 13-04813 SVW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-04813 SVW (AFM)

10-07-2016

KEVIN WILLIAM KING, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that

(1) the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted;

(2) the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 48 and 61) are granted;

(3) plaintiff's federal claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice;

(4) plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff raising them in state court;

(5) defendant Rabbani's Motion for Sanctions against plaintiff (ECF No. 66) is denied;

(6) plaintiff's request for a stay pending resolution of Case No. CV 15-07072-SVW (AFM) is denied; and

(7) Judgment be entered dismissing this action without further leave to amend. DATED: October 7, 2016

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

King v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2016
Case No. CV 13-04813 SVW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2016)
Case details for

King v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN WILLIAM KING, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 13-04813 SVW (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2016)