From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Cnty. of L.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2014
NO. CV 10-6592-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 10-6592-TJH (AGR)

01-10-2014

WILLIAM KING, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment; (2) denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; and (3) dismissing the complaint with prejudice. DATED: January 10, 2014

/s/_________

TERRY J. HATTER, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

King v. Cnty. of L.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2014
NO. CV 10-6592-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2014)
Case details for

King v. Cnty. of L.A.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KING, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 10-6592-TJH (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2014)