From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Burnett

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 3, 2022
22-CV-1981 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 3, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-1981 (LTS)

05-03-2022

WAYNE KING, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD BURNETT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated March 10, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Burnett

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 3, 2022
22-CV-1981 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 3, 2022)
Case details for

King v. Burnett

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE KING, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD BURNETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 3, 2022

Citations

22-CV-1981 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 3, 2022)