From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Barone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-175 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-175 Erie

02-14-2012

DERRICK L. KING, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BARONE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 12, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 65], filed on January 19, 2012, recommended that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 58] be granted. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections. Plaintiff filed objections [ECF No. 67] on February 10, 2012. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 58] is GRANTED. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 65] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on January 19, 2012, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The clerk is directed to close the case.

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge
cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

King v. Barone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-175 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

King v. Barone

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK L. KING, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BARONE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-175 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2012)