From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Auto. Max Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 15, 2024
2:23-cv-02350-JDW (E.D. Pa. May. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-02350-JDW

05-15-2024

VERNON KING, Plaintiff, v. AUTO MAX CORPORATION, and I & A AUTO SALES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

HON. JOSHUA D. WOLSON, United States District Judge.

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Auto Max Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 (ECF No. 47) and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because the docket does not reflect that Mr. King ever made service upon Defendant I&A Auto Sales, Inc., Plaintiff shall show cause in a memorandum not to exceed 7 pages, filed on or before May 22, 2024, why I should not dismiss the claims against I&A without prejudice.


Summaries of

King v. Auto. Max Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 15, 2024
2:23-cv-02350-JDW (E.D. Pa. May. 15, 2024)
Case details for

King v. Auto. Max Corp.

Case Details

Full title:VERNON KING, Plaintiff, v. AUTO MAX CORPORATION, and I & A AUTO SALES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 15, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-02350-JDW (E.D. Pa. May. 15, 2024)