From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King-Mays v. Univ. of Pa.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 21, 2014
No. 05-13-01129-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-13-01129-CV

03-21-2014

NADINE R. KING-MAYS, Appellant v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee


DISMISS; Opinion Filed March 21, 2014.

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02254


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang

Opinion by Justice Lang

The filing fee, the docketing statement, and appellant's brief in this case are past due. By postcard dated August 19, 2013, we notified appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 19, 2013, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By postcard dated January 21, 2014, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both appellant's brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed a docketing statement, filed her brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

__________

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
131129F.P05

JUDGMENT

NADINE R. KING-MAYS, Appellant

V. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee No. 05-13-01129-CV

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02254.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices

Moseley and Francis participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA recover its costs of this appeal from appellant NADINE R. KING-MAYS.

__________

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE


Summaries of

King-Mays v. Univ. of Pa.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 21, 2014
No. 05-13-01129-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2014)
Case details for

King-Mays v. Univ. of Pa.

Case Details

Full title:NADINE R. KING-MAYS, Appellant v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

No. 05-13-01129-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2014)