From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinderlen v. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01951 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01951 JLT (PC)

01-23-2012

STEVEN KINDERLEN, Plaintiff, v. PAT KANE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISREGARDING ADDENDUM TO CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT


(Doc. 12)

On November 23, 2011, Plaintiff initiated this civil rights action against various individuals. Before the Court had the opportunity to screen the complaint, Plaintiff filed an "Addendum to Civil Rights Complaint." (Doc. 12) In it, Plaintiff does not restate his earlier claims but seeks to dismiss one defendant and to add more claims to his existing complaint. Id.

Though Plaintiff has the right to amend his complaint one time without leave of the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), his amended complaint must be "complete in itself without reference to the prior or superceded pleading." Local Rule 220. Thus, should Plaintiff wish to file an amended complaint, he may do so within 30 days. In any event, the Court will DISREGARD his current Addendum. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kinderlen v. Kane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01951 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Kinderlen v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN KINDERLEN, Plaintiff, v. PAT KANE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01951 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2012)