From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIND v. BERTINE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1902
74 App. Div. 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

June Term, 1902.


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


This action was brought to recover $189 for board alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiff to Mrs. Anna M.E. Detmers, the testatrix of the defendants. The case was tried before a referee, who decided against the claim, and from the judgment entered upon his report the plaintiff has appealed. The record contains no exceptions to the findings of fact or law. The appellant, therefore, has no standing to question their correctness in this court. ( Millar v. Larmer, 85 Hun, 313.) There are six exceptions by the plaintiff to rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence, but none of these discloses any error. Notwithstanding the absence of any exception to the decision we have carefully gone over the evidence and are of the opinion that it fully sustains the referee's conclusion. The judgment must be affirmed. All concurred.


Summaries of

KIND v. BERTINE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1902
74 App. Div. 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

KIND v. BERTINE

Case Details

Full title:William Kind, Appellant, v. Walter S. Bertine and Anna M. Bertine, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1902

Citations

74 App. Div. 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)