From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinchen v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 17, 1988
531 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1988)

Opinion

No. 70780.

September 8, 1988. Rehearing Denied October 17, 1988.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Richard B. Greene, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Lee Rosenthal, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We have for review Kinchen v. State, 508 So.2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which certified the following question of great public importance:

Is it necessary, in evaluating an assertion of harmless error in a criminal appeal, that each appellate judge independently read the complete trial record?
Id. at 51. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In the companion case of Ciccarelli v. State, 531 So.2d 129 (Fla. 1988), we have answered the same question. See Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (posing same certified question). Accordingly we quash the decision below and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Ciccarelli. We confine our review to the issue certified by the district court, and thus do not address any other issues raised by the parties.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kinchen v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 17, 1988
531 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1988)
Case details for

Kinchen v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDY EUGENE KINCHEN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 17, 1988

Citations

531 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1988)