From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinchen v. AT&T Corp.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 9, 2015
DOCKET NO. A-3770-14T2 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2015)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-3770-14T2

11-09-2015

MARTHA KINCHEN, individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of her late Husband, CARL KINCHEN, and the Individual Heirs of the Estate of CARL KINCHEN, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. AT&T CORP., Defendant-Appellant, and ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC. (For Discovery Purposes Only), Defendant-Respondent.

Gibbons, P.C., attorneys for appellant (Kelly S. Crawford and Kenneth Dzikowski, on the briefs). Cohen, Placitella & Roth, P.C., attorneys for respondent (Christopher M. Placitella, Keven H. Friedman and Jillian A.S. Roman, on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION Before Judges Messano, Simonelli, and Carroll. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-3571-13. Gibbons, P.C., attorneys for appellant (Kelly S. Crawford and Kenneth Dzikowski, on the briefs). Cohen, Placitella & Roth, P.C., attorneys for respondent (Christopher M. Placitella, Keven H. Friedman and Jillian A.S. Roman, on the brief). PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

Kinchen v. AT&T Corp.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 9, 2015
DOCKET NO. A-3770-14T2 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Kinchen v. AT&T Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA KINCHEN, individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2015

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-3770-14T2 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2015)