From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kincaid v. Croskey

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Sep 9, 2015
SC: 148412 (Mich. Sep. 9, 2015)

Opinion

SC: 148412 SC: 148413

09-09-2015

EMILY KINCAID, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ROBERT CROSKEY and WOLPIN COMPANY, d/b/a TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE COMPANY/WAYNE COUNTY, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and EXAMWORKS, Nonparty-Appellee/Cross-Appellee. EMILY KINCAID, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ROBERT CROSKEY and WOLPIN COMPANY, d/b/a TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE COMPANY/WAYNE COUNTY, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and CLIFFORD LEE, JR., Intervening Plaintiff.


Order

148412-3 & (89) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, Justices COA: 310148
Wayne CC: 11-004918-NI
COA: 311857
Wayne CC: 11-004918-NI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Kincaid v. Croskey

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Sep 9, 2015
SC: 148412 (Mich. Sep. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Kincaid v. Croskey

Case Details

Full title:EMILY KINCAID, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ROBERT CROSKEY and…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Sep 9, 2015

Citations

SC: 148412 (Mich. Sep. 9, 2015)