From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kincaid v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-11359 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-11359

06-25-2012

TIMOTHY KINCAID, a/k/a Sha-Teak A. Imani, Petitioner, v. D. BERGH, Respondent.


HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF


ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION

FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Petitioner Timothy Kincaid has appealed the Court's opinion and judgment denying his habeas corpus petition. The Court dismissed the habeas petition because it was barred by the one-year statute of limitations and because Petitioner's claim that the state court lacked jurisdiction to try him lacked merit.

A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Where a district court has rejected the constitutional claims on the merits, the showing required to satisfy § 2253(c) is straightforward: The petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. . . . When the district court denies a habeas petition on procedural grounds without reaching the prisoner's underlying constitutional claim, a [certificate of appealability] should issue when the prisoner shows, at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

For the reasons given in the Court's dispositive opinion, reasonable jurists would not find the Court's assessment of Petitioner's jurisdictional claim debatable or wrong. Nor would reasonable jurists debate whether the Court's procedural ruling was correct or whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability [dkt. #17] is DENIED.

______________

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record by electronic or U.S. mail on June 25, 2012.

Marie E. Verlinde

Case Manager

(810) 984-3290


Summaries of

Kincaid v. Bergh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-11359 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Kincaid v. Bergh

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY KINCAID, a/k/a Sha-Teak A. Imani, Petitioner, v. D. BERGH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-11359 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)